Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods in the form of oleoresins and essential oils manufactured in a solvent extraction plant were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 115/75 covering the oil mill and solvent extraction industry.
Analysis: The notification, issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, exempted goods manufactured in factories covered by the industries specified in the Schedule, including oil mill and solvent extraction industry. The expression was read according to its plain wording, and the goods were produced in a solvent extraction plant falling within that description. The later amendment excluding only fixed vegetable oils and vegetable fats and oils was treated as indicating that essential oils and oleoresins were not meant to be excluded. The narrower construction adopted by the Tribunal was rejected.
Conclusion: The goods manufactured by the appellants were covered by the exemption notification and were entitled to the benefit of the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be applied according to its plain terms, and where a later amendment excludes only specified goods, other goods not so excluded remain within the exemption.