Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PU foam and quilted PU foam manufactured by a unit engaged in the coir industry were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 115/75.
Analysis: Notification No. 115/75 exempts goods manufactured in factories covered by the industries specified in the Schedule, and the assessee's unit was undisputedly a coir industry. The notification was construed on its plain wording, and the fact that the intermediary products were captively consumed in the manufacture of rubberized coir mattresses did not justify denying the exemption, particularly when the notification did not specifically exclude PU foam or quilted PU foam. The earlier interpretation of the same notification was followed to hold that the benefit cannot be curtailed by reading a narrower restriction into the exemption than the language used.
Conclusion: The intermediary products were held entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 115/75, and the denial of benefit was set aside.