Service tax notification benefit cannot be denied solely for paying under Section 66A reverse charge mechanism

CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to benefit of Notification No. 17/2004-ST despite paying service tax under Section 66A on reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal held that denial of notification benefit solely because service tax was discharged under Section 66A was incorrect, following precedent from Mumbai Bench. Additionally, TDS amount paid by appellant to Income Tax department could not be included in gross taxable value for service tax calculation, as it did not form part of consideration for overseas services. The impugned order was set aside.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 17/2004-ST when service tax is discharged under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994.
2. Inclusion of TDS amount in the gross taxable value on which service tax was paid.

Summary:

Issue 1: Entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 17/2004-ST

The appellant, engaged in the manufacture and sale of electronic connectors, imported 'IPR services' and 'Management Consultancy' services from related parties outside India, paying service tax under the reverse charge mechanism as per Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant claimed exemption under Notification No. 17/2004-ST, which exempts service tax equivalent to the amount of R&D cess paid. The Department contended that the exemption is only available to the holder of IPR paying service tax under Section 66, not to the receiver of service under Section 66A. The Tribunal found that the appellant, being liable to pay service tax under Section 66A, is eligible for the exemption. This view was supported by precedents such as Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt Ltd. vs. CST and CCE & ST vs. Cummins Technologies India Ltd, which clarified that Section 66A creates a legal fiction deeming the service recipient as the service provider, thus making them eligible for the exemption under Notification No. 17/2004-ST.

Issue 2: Inclusion of TDS amount in the gross taxable value

The appellant argued that the TDS amount paid to the Income Tax Department should not be included in the gross taxable value for service tax purposes. The Tribunal referred to the Management Service Agreement, which stipulated that taxes applied on invoices are to be borne by the invoiced entity, and similar cases like VSL India Pvt Ltd vs. CST. The Tribunal held that TDS is a tax obligation and does not partake the character of value or consideration for services. Therefore, the TDS amount paid by the appellant from its own funds should not form part of the consideration for the service charges paid to the overseas service provider, and service tax is not payable on the TDS amount.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief as per law, concluding that the appellant is entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 17/2004-ST and that the TDS amount should not be included in the gross taxable value for service tax purposes.

(Order pronounced in the court on 26/10/2023)

---