Appellant's Role Confirmed as C&F Agent; Tribunal Orders Service Tax Adjustment, Waives Penalties Due to Payments Made.

The Tribunal concluded that the Appellant was engaged in Clearing and Forwarding activities and not merely as a C & F Vendor. It determined that the expenses incurred were normal costs of a C & F Agent and not reimbursable. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to verify and adjust the Service Tax and interest amounts already paid by the Appellant against the confirmed demand. Penalties imposed on the Appellant were set aside, given that the majority of the Service Tax had been paid.

---

---

Issues:
The issues involved in this case are whether the Appellant providing C & F Vendor service is liable to pay Service Tax, the nature of services being provided by the Appellant, and the applicability of reimbursement in the payment of Service Tax.

Issue 1 - Liability to Pay Service Tax:
The Appellant claimed they were not liable to pay Service Tax under the service of C & F Vendor service as they were not undertaking "clearing and forwarding" activities. However, the Department issued a Show Cause Notice alleging that the Appellant was providing C & F Agency Service and not paying Service Tax on various charges. The demands were confirmed by the lower authorities, leading the Appellant to appeal before the Tribunal.

Issue 2 - Nature of Services Provided:
The Appellant contended that they were only "C&F Vendors" to the principal and not providing "clearing and forwarding" services. They argued that in case of reimbursement, they are not obligated to pay Service Tax, citing a relevant case law. On the other hand, the Authorized Representative pointed out specific clauses in the Agreement showing that the Appellant was required to undertake activities that fall under C & F Agency service, including storing and clearing goods for various clients. The representative argued that the expenses incurred by the Appellant were not reimbursements but normal costs of a C & F Agent.

Issue 3 - Applicability of Reimbursement in Service Tax Payment:
The Tribunal analyzed the Agreement and observed that the Appellant was indeed engaged in activities that constitute Clearing and Forwarding service. The Tribunal also noted that the expenses mentioned in the Agreement were incurred by the Appellant and not qualified as reimbursable expenses. Referring to a previous judgment, the Tribunal emphasized that costs for input services cannot be treated as reimbursable costs.

In the judgment, the Tribunal rejected the Appellant's argument that they were only providing C & F Vendor services, concluding that they were indeed engaged in Clearing and Forwarding activities as per the Agreement. The Tribunal also highlighted that the expenses incurred by the Appellant were not reimbursable but normal costs of a C & F Agent. Despite this, the Tribunal acknowledged the Appellant's payment of Service Tax and interest, directing the Adjudicating Authority to verify the amounts paid and adjust the confirmed demand accordingly. The penalties imposed on the Appellant were set aside due to the majority of the Service Tax already being paid.

---