Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the Service Tax under this service. The Department issued Show Cause Notice on the ground that they were providing C & F Agency Service and they were not paying the Service Tax on godown Charges, Security charges, Guard charges, Electricity Charges etc. After due process, the demands were confirmed along with interest and penalty. Being aggrieved, the Appellant is before the Tribunal. 2. The Learned Consultant submits that they are only "C&F Vendors" to ITC and hence are not providing the service of "clearing and forwarding" on behalf of ITC. Further he submits that in case of reimbursement, they are not required to pay the Service Tax and rely on the case law of Sri Bhagavathy Traders Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin-2011 (24....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the activity of Clearing and Forwarding service. Therefore, we reject the Appellant‟s submission that they are only carrying on the „C & F Vendor‟ services. 6. On going through Annexure 2 of the Agreement, it is seen that the amounts mentioned under the headings Rent, Security and Guards etc. are rounded figures and reflect that these are expenses which are being incurred by the Appellant. It is not mentioned anywhere that the expenses are being incurred on behalf of the principal to qualify as reimbursable expenses. 7. The Larger Bench in the case of Sri Bhagavathy Traders Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, cited supra has held as under- 6.2 Similar is the situation in the transaction between a service ....