Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the DEEC scheme, the customs authorities could verify and certify the correctness of the export value even where no export duty was leviable, and whether Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 furnished the proper method for such determination.
Analysis: The DEEC scheme required the customs officer's authentication of the export particulars, including FOB value, and the scheme's object was to grant import-duty benefits only on the basis of correctly certified export value. The customs power was not confined to assessment of duty; Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 was the statutory method for determining value whenever that value was relevant under the Act, notifications, export control orders, foreign trade rules, or allied regulatory provisions. The Court held that the customs authorities were entitled to inquire into suspected over-invoicing and were not bound to accept the exporter's declaration as conclusive. The statutory and regulatory framework supported the conclusion that incorrect valuation could attract confiscation and penalty consequences.
Conclusion: The customs authorities had jurisdiction to determine the correct export value under the DEEC scheme, and such determination was not limited to cases where customs duty was assessable.