Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the assessee's plea that re-engraving of used rotogravure printing cylinders does not amount to manufacture and for examination of the earlier tribunal and departmental communications.
Analysis: The appeals arose from demands confirmed on the footing that the assessable value adopted for re-engraving of duty-paid cylinders supplied free by customers was contrary to the Central Excise Valuation Rules. The assessee's core contention before the Tribunal was that the activity itself did not amount to manufacture and that the issue had already been settled by a Larger Bench decision and followed in the assessee's own earlier case. The record showed that these materials had not been placed before or considered by the authorities below. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considered it to send the matter back so that the adjudicating authority could examine the Larger Bench ruling, the subsequent order in the assessee's own case, and the departmental communication directing discharge of service tax on the same activity.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.