<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443886</link>
    <description>Re-engraving of used rotogravure printing cylinders supplied free by customers was discussed in relation to whether the activity amounted to manufacture and whether the assessable value adopted under the Central Excise Valuation Rules was correct. The Tribunal noted that the assessee relied on a Larger Bench decision, an earlier order in its own case, and departmental communications indicating that the same activity had been treated as service tax-liable, but these materials had not been examined below. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, with directions to examine the earlier rulings and communications and to give the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:42:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443886</link>
      <description>Re-engraving of used rotogravure printing cylinders supplied free by customers was discussed in relation to whether the activity amounted to manufacture and whether the assessable value adopted under the Central Excise Valuation Rules was correct. The Tribunal noted that the assessee relied on a Larger Bench decision, an earlier order in its own case, and departmental communications indicating that the same activity had been treated as service tax-liable, but these materials had not been examined below. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, with directions to examine the earlier rulings and communications and to give the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>