1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>SC Dismisses Petition After Delay Condoned; Exemption Granted for Certified Copy Filing; No Interference Needed.</h1> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay and allowing an exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned order. The ... Validity of reopening of assessment - reopening as initiated beyond 4 years - Reasons to believe - As decided by HC [2022 (12) TMI 404 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] notice u/s 148 is to be issued after expiry of four years or before expiry of six years, the assessee should have failed to disclose the βmaterial factsβ and on consideration of the material on record has held that AO has not even stated or alleged that there was failure on the part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the said assessment years - HELD THAT:- Delay condoned. Application seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. This Court is of the opinion that the impugned order does not call for interference. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court in the case cited as 2023 (9) TMI 1043 - SC Order, dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay and allowing exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned order. The Court held that the impugned order does not require any interference.