Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for determining the classification and rate of export duty on Iron Ore Fines, the Fe content had to be calculated on Wet Metric Ton basis or Dry Metric Ton basis for the relevant period prior to 1 May 2022.
Analysis: The governing position for the relevant period was taken from the earlier Supreme Court ruling and the Board circular, both of which treated Fe content in exported iron ore as determinable on Wet Metric Ton basis by accounting for moisture and other impurities. The later statutory supplement introducing Dry Metric Ton calculation for Chapter 26 was noted as operative only from 1 May 2022 and therefore not applicable to the assessments in dispute. Since the assessments had proceeded on a Dry Metric Ton basis for a pre-1 May 2022 period, the adoption of that method was held to be incorrect.
Conclusion: The determination of Fe content was required to be made on Wet Metric Ton basis for the relevant assessments, and the impugned assessment orders could not be sustained.