Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Fe content of iron ore fines exported for the purpose of classification and rate of export duty is to be determined on Wet Metric Ton basis or Dry Metric Ton basis, and whether the exported goods were entitled to nil export duty on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The issue stood governed by the principle that the Fe percentage for export classification is to be determined on the basis of the goods as presented for export, after giving effect to the moisture content. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that the universally recognised conversion formula must be applied to convert the dry basis Fe percentage into wet basis Fe percentage. On the certificate produced for the export in question, the wet basis Fe content worked out to below 58%, which brought the goods within the nil-duty slab under the relevant exemption notification. The Tribunal therefore held that the duty demand sustained on a dry basis could not stand.
Conclusion: The Fe content was required to be determined on Wet Metric Ton basis, and on that basis the exported goods were not liable to export duty under the applicable notification.