TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Hyderabad Rules for Exporters on Fe Fines Assessment Methodology</h1> <h3>M/s. Obulapuram Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC, Visakhapatnam (Vice-Versa)</h3> M/s. Obulapuram Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC, Visakhapatnam (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues:1. Fe fines exported by M/s. Obulapuram Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd.2. Interpretation of FTP 2007-08 regarding Fe content restrictions for export.3. Confiscation of iron ore consignments and imposition of penalties under Customs Act, 1962.4. Validity of Board's Circular No.4/2012-Cus. dt. 17/02/2012 on assessment of Fe content for export duty.5. Correct methodology for determining Fe content for export purposes.Analysis:The appeals before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad involved the export of Fe fines by M/s. Obulapuram Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd. The issue centered around the Fe content of the exported consignments, with the Department contending that consignments with Fe content exceeding 64% fell under a restricted category per FTP 2007-08. The Department had ordered confiscation of the iron ore consignments and imposed penalties under the Customs Act, 1962, leading to the appeals.During the hearing, the appellant's counsel highlighted Board Circular No.4/2012-Cus. dt. 17/02/2012, which clarified the methodology for assessing Fe content for export duty purposes. The Circular emphasized assessment on a Wet Metric Ton (WMT) basis to determine net Fe content accurately. The counsel argued that testing on a dry basis without considering impurities did not reflect the correct percentage for FTP compliance.The Tribunal considered the arguments and the Board's Circular, which favored the appellant's position. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporters, allowing their appeals in full. The Department's appeals were dismissed as they could not succeed in light of the Circular. The Tribunal's decision was based on the correct assessment methodology for Fe content as per the Circular, providing consequential reliefs to the appellants.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the assessment methodology for determining Fe content for export duty, emphasizing the importance of following the guidelines set forth in the Board's Circular. The decision highlighted the significance of accurate assessment to ensure compliance with export regulations and upheld the appeals of the exporters based on the correct interpretation of the relevant provisions.
TaxTMI 