TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition Dismissed Over Unproven Ownership; Tampered Documents Found by Commission; Interim Order Vacated.</h1> <h3>DINESH BHABOOTMAL SALECHA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)</h3> SC dismissed the special leave petition because the petitioner could not establish ownership of the goods, and the Settlement Commission identified ... Seeking provisional release of the seized goods - to whom / any person - iPhones - Respondent’s ownership of such goods itself is seriously disputed - contravention of Section 110 A of the Customs Act, 1962 - HELD THAT:- The petitioner has not been able to satisfy that they ever acquired title in the goods. On the other hand, learned ASG pointed out that the matter went to the Settlement Commission which has found even the documents produced by the petitioner are tampered with. There are no reason to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India - SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition as the petitioner failed to prove ownership of the goods and the Settlement Commission found tampered documents. Interim order vacated, pending applications disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
