Purposive construction of export scheme: overall compliance, natural justice, and maintainability led to entitlement certificates being granted.

A duty exemption scheme and its licence conditions must be read purposively as a whole, so export compliance is tested on overall performance rather than box-wise where that construction would defeat the scheme's object. On the admitted facts, the imported boxes were fully used, the FOB value obligation was substantially met, and the permissible quantity variation was not exceeded, so refusal of the special REP entitlement certificates was unjustified. Refusal carrying civil consequences also required notice, hearing and reasons, and the writ petitions were maintainable because the suggested appeal was not an effective remedy in the circumstances. The impugned orders were set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the refusal to issue special REP entitlement certificates was justified on the ground that the export obligation in respect of corrugated fibre board boxes had to be tested box-wise rather than on the basis of the entire export quantity taken as one unit. (ii) Whether the impugned refusal was vitiated for want of notice, hearing and a reasoned order, and whether the writ petitions were barred by availability of an alternative remedy.

Issue (i): Whether the refusal to issue special REP entitlement certificates was justified on the ground that the export obligation in respect of corrugated fibre board boxes had to be tested box-wise rather than on the basis of the entire export quantity taken as one unit.

Analysis: The scheme was framed to enable registered exporters to import duty-free inputs for export production and to make exports competitive. The licences, DEEC book and conditions had to be read as a whole and interpreted in a manner that advances the object of the scheme. The essential requirements were that the imported boxes should be fully used for packing the export goods, the FOB value obligation should be achieved, and the overall quantity variation should remain within the permissible limit. A literal box-wise construction would defeat the scheme, make it unworkable, and introduce an arbitrary restriction without real nexus to the policy objective. On the admitted facts, all imported boxes were used, the FOB value obligation was substantially exceeded, and the overall quantity shortfall was within the permissible margin.

Conclusion: The petitioner's compliance was to be assessed on the overall export performance, not box-wise, and the refusal to grant the special REP entitlement certificates was unjustified. The finding is in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the impugned refusal was vitiated for want of notice, hearing and a reasoned order, and whether the writ petitions were barred by availability of an alternative remedy.

Analysis: The refusal resulted in civil consequences and therefore attracted the requirement of notice, hearing and reasons. The objection based on alternative remedy was not accepted because the impugned action was effectively taken at the instance of the higher authority and the suggested appeal was not an effective remedy in the circumstances.

Conclusion: The impugned orders suffered from violation of natural justice, and the writ petitions were maintainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the petitioner was held entitled to the special REP entitlement certificates and consequential reliefs.

Ratio Decidendi: A duty exemption scheme and its licence conditions must be construed purposively and as a whole so that overall compliance with the export obligation is tested in light of the scheme's object, and a refusal affecting civil consequences requires observance of natural justice.

---