Fraudulent lease deeds and occupation charges under insolvency law led to dismissal of the challenge to eviction directions.

The appeal concerned directions for removal of the appellant from the corporate debtor's land and payment of occupation charges under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The challenge was considered against the earlier finding that the two lease deeds appeared fraudulent and undervalued, and in light of the same-day connected judgment involving the same rent agreements. The impugned order had also required vacation of the premises and payment for continued occupation. The appeal was not entertained and was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal challenging the order directing removal of the appellant from the corporate debtor's land and payment of occupation charges deserved interference.

Analysis: The appeal arose from orders passed in applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code concerning a lease arrangement over the corporate debtor's land. The challenge was considered in the context of the earlier finding that the two lease deeds appeared to be fraudulent and undervalued, and in light of the separate judgment delivered the same day in connected appeals involving the same rent agreements. The Court also noticed the impugned order's directions for vacation of the premises and payment linked to continued occupation.

Conclusion: The appeal was not entertained and was dismissed.

---