Supreme Court revives decade-old CENVAT credit dispute, orders swift resolution by GST Commissioner within 8 weeks.

The SC set aside the HC's order quashing show cause notices related to CENVAT credit, which had been pending for over a decade without resolution. The appeal by the Department was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner of GST with instructions to conclude the proceedings within eight weeks. Both parties were directed to appear and present their arguments without the need for additional notices. The SC emphasized the importance of a fair and timely adjudication process, leaving all contentions open for consideration by the Authority. The matter was disposed of with no costs.

---

---

Issues involved:
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the closure of proceedings initiated by two show cause notices by the Department, the failure of the respondents to appear for personal hearings, the High Court's decision to quash the show cause notices, the prejudice to the Revenue, and the need to conclude the proceedings within a specific timeframe.

Closure of Proceedings:
The Department appealed against the High Court's order closing proceedings initiated by two show cause notices regarding CENVAT credit availed by the respondents. The High Court accepted the respondent's contentions and quashed the notices, leading to the conclusion of the proceedings. The Additional Solicitor General argued that the abrupt conclusion prejudiced the Revenue as the demands made were not adjudicated upon, while the respondent's counsel highlighted the prolonged lack of adjudication on the notices.

Remand and Conclusion of Proceedings:
The Supreme Court found that despite over a decade passing, the proceedings from the show cause notices remained inconclusive. The Court accepted the Additional Solicitor General's submission to conclude the proceedings within a specified timeframe. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of GST with a direction to conclude the proceedings within eight weeks from a specified date. The respondents were directed to appear without separate notices, and both sides were granted an opportunity to present their contentions before the Authority.

Decision:
The appeal was allowed, and the matter was disposed of with no costs. The Court emphasized the need for the Authority to provide adequate opportunity to both sides and conclude the proceedings within the stipulated timeframe. All contentions on both sides were left open to be raised before the concerned Authority, ensuring a fair and comprehensive adjudication process.

---