Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether prolonged and unexplained non-adjudication of the show cause notices rendered the continuation of the proceedings arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The writ petitions challenged show cause notices issued in 2008, with adjudication remaining pending for more than 17 years. The Court noted the departmental circulars requiring expeditious adjudication of show cause proceedings and the absence of any justifiable explanation from the Revenue for the extraordinary delay. The transfer of the matters to the call book did not supply a valid justification for keeping the proceedings pending indefinitely. Relying on the line of authorities holding that inordinate and unexplained delay in adjudication of tax show cause notices is arbitrary, the Court held that such continued pendency offends the guarantee of equality.
Conclusion: The delay in adjudication made the continuation of the proceedings arbitrary and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and the show cause notices were liable to be set aside.