Transfer Pricing System ruling aligns with Customs Act & Valuation Rules for related party import transactions.

The ruling concluded that the Transfer Pricing System and Steering Concept (TPuS) method for determining the transaction value of goods imported from related parties is consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The ruling will apply prospectively to the TPuS method proposed to be adopted by the applicant for transaction value determination from 1st May 2023. The applicant must comply with the procedure prescribed in the CBEC (now CBIC) Circular No. 5/2016 Customs dated 09/02/2016 for related party transactions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Acceptability of the Transfer Pricing System and Steering Concept (TPuS) method for determining customs value.
2. Compliance with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (CVR, 2007).
3. Applicability of Rule 3(3)(a), Rule 4, Rule 5, Rule 7, and Rule 10 of CVR, 2007.
4. Provisional assessment and finalization of customs duty.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Acceptability of the Transfer Pricing System and Steering Concept (TPuS) method for determining customs value.
The applicant proposed using the TPuS method, also known as the Resale Price Method or Resale Minus Method, to determine the customs value of goods imported from related parties. Under TPuS, the customs value is based on the manufacturing cost plus a Commercial Adjustment Rate (CAR). The CAR is calculated by deducting all costs and a target EBIT from the sales value charged to unrelated buyers in India. The ruling concluded that the TPuS method is consistent with Rule 7: Deductive Value Method of the CVR, 2007, as both methods involve deductive computations from the same benchmark price and similar price elements.

Issue 2: Compliance with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (CVR, 2007).
The ruling examined whether the TPuS method complies with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, which governs the valuation of goods for customs purposes. Section 14 stipulates that the value of imported goods shall be the transaction value, i.e., the price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to India. The ruling found that the TPuS method ensures recovery of all costs and profit, thereby complying with the provisions of Section 14 and Rule 3(3)(a) of the CVR, 2007.

Issue 3: Applicability of Rule 3(3)(a), Rule 4, Rule 5, Rule 7, and Rule 10 of CVR, 2007.
- Rule 3(3)(a): The ruling stated that the TPuS method complies with Rule 3(3)(a), which requires that the transaction value be accepted if the relationship between the buyer and seller did not influence the price. The TPuS method demonstrated that the price is adequate to ensure recovery of all costs and profit, indicating that the relationship did not influence the price.
- Rule 4: The ruling agreed with the applicant's contention that Rule 4, which is based on the transaction value of identical goods, is not feasible as the imported goods are customized and enjoy a distinct brand value.
- Rule 5: Similarly, the ruling found that Rule 5, based on the transaction value of similar goods, is not applicable as the imported goods cannot be compared with any other products due to their unique brand value.
- Rule 7: The ruling confirmed that the TPuS method is consistent with Rule 7: Deductive Value Method, as both methods involve deductive computations from the same benchmark price and similar price elements.
- Rule 10: The ruling found that the application of Rule 10 is not warranted as the applicant is not making any payments (e.g., royalty, license fee) that need to be added to the transaction value.

Issue 4: Provisional assessment and finalization of customs duty.
The ruling noted that since all elements of the transaction value cannot be definitively determined at the time of import, the assessment should be provisional. The applicant proposed to make adjustments to the declared price (transaction value) after the end of the financial period and discharge the remaining customs duty and other liabilities accordingly.

Conclusion:
The ruling concluded that the TPuS method for determining the transaction value of goods imported from related parties is consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the CVR, 2007. The ruling will apply prospectively to the TPuS method proposed to be adopted by the applicant for transaction value determination from 1st May 2023. The applicant must comply with the procedure prescribed in the CBEC (now CBIC) Circular No. 5/2016 Customs dated 09/02/2016 for related party transactions.

---