Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether prior sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was required before prosecuting the applicants for the alleged offence under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Analysis: The applicants were found to be public servants employed in connection with the affairs of the Union and not removable from service without the sanction of the Central Government. The alleged incident arose during a raid and search conducted in the course of their official duties, and the complaint was directly connected with the execution of that duty. Applying the settled test of reasonable connection between the act complained of and official duty, the protection under Section 197 was attracted. The trial court and revisional court erred in treating the act as wholly unconnected with official duty and in refusing sanction protection.
Conclusion: Prior sanction was necessary, and the prosecution could not be sustained without it.