Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether previous sanction under section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was necessary for prosecution of the public servants for assault, wrongful confinement and use of criminal force during a search carried out under statutory authority, and whether the question of sanction could be decided only from the complaint or also from materials brought on record at later stages.
Analysis: The act complained of must have a reasonable connection with the discharge of official duty. It is not necessary that the act should be strictly within duty or that it should never involve excess, because even an act done in excess of duty may still fall within the protection of section 197 if the accused can reasonably claim that it was done in virtue of office. The Court also held that the necessity of sanction is not confined to the averments in the complaint alone; it may emerge at any stage from the complaint, the inquiry, or the evidence. On the facts, the alleged assault and use of force were directly connected with the execution of the authorised search and the resistance offered to it.
Conclusion: Previous sanction was necessary, and the prosecutions could not proceed without it.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the orders holding sanction necessary and protecting the accused from prosecution were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A public servant is protected by section 197 where the act complained of bears a reasonable connection with official duty and can reasonably be claimed to have been done in virtue of office, even if the act exceeds what was strictly necessary.