Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the facts alleged against a police officer for acts said to have occurred during a raid, the criminal proceedings could continue without prior sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether the question of sanction should be examined only after some evidence is recorded.
Analysis: The protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is intended to shield public servants from vexatious prosecution for acts done in the discharge, or purported discharge, of official duty, but that protection is not absolute. The decisive consideration is whether the acts complained of bear a sufficient connection with official duty, which cannot always be conclusively determined at the threshold in cases involving rival versions and disputed facts. Where the allegations disclose possible excesses during the performance of official functions, the trial court may proceed to record evidence before finally deciding whether sanction is necessary. Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 does not require every prosecution to be halted at the preliminary stage if doing so would prematurely obstruct the criminal trial and the factual inquiry.
Conclusion: The proceedings were properly allowed to continue without prior sanction at that stage, and the petition was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: The necessity of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 depends on whether the impugned acts have a reasonable nexus with official duty, and in a doubtful case the issue may be deferred until evidence clarifies the connection.