Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether export sales were required to be included in gross turnover for determining the composition amount under the Composition Scheme for Gems and Stones, 2006.
Analysis: The scheme was framed under section 5 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and permitted payment of tax in lump sum in lieu of tax liability on sales within the State, with the composition amount linked to gross turnover of the relevant year. Read with the constitutional bar under Articles 265 and 286 of the Constitution of India, the scheme could not be construed to authorise levy on export sales. The earlier decision relied upon by the Revenue was held distinguishable because it arose under a different tax regime and did not consider the effect of section 5 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the phraseology of the 2006 scheme.
Conclusion: Export sales were not includible in gross turnover for the purpose of computing the composition amount, and the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a composition scheme under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is confined to sales within the State and operates as a lump sum discharge of tax liability, export sales cannot be brought into the turnover base for computing the composition amount.