Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the technical bids was justified on the ground that the tax audit reports and balance-sheets submitted with the bids did not bear the Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN), and whether such documents could be relied upon to satisfy the tender requirement.
Analysis: The tender required submission of audited balance-sheets, profit and loss account statements and a Chartered Accountant's certificate to establish the prescribed average turnover. The Technical Evaluation Committee was held entitled to insist on duly authenticated documents capable of being verified from its own office and was not expected to make independent enquiries from external departments. The notification issued on 02.08.2019 made UDIN mandatory for tax audit reports, and the tax audit reports produced by the petitioner admittedly did not bear UDIN. In that situation, the Committee was justified in treating the reports as not reliable for evaluation purposes.
Conclusion: The rejection of the technical bids was held to be justified, and the challenge to the rejection failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tender documents require authenticated financial records and the governing professional notification makes UDIN mandatory for tax audit reports, bids supported by tax audit reports lacking UDIN may be rejected as unverifiable and unreliable for tender evaluation.