<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1073 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438266</link>
    <description>Tender evaluation may reject bids supported by financial records that are not duly authenticated and verifiable, where the tender requires audited balance-sheets, profit and loss accounts, and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate to establish average turnover. The Technical Evaluation Committee was entitled to rely only on documents capable of verification from its own office and was not bound to make independent enquiries from external departments. Because the relevant tax audit reports did not bear UDIN, as required by the professional notification issued on 02.08.2019, the committee could treat them as unreliable for evaluation. The challenge to the rejection of the technical bids therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1073 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438266</link>
      <description>Tender evaluation may reject bids supported by financial records that are not duly authenticated and verifiable, where the tender requires audited balance-sheets, profit and loss accounts, and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate to establish average turnover. The Technical Evaluation Committee was entitled to rely only on documents capable of verification from its own office and was not bound to make independent enquiries from external departments. Because the relevant tax audit reports did not bear UDIN, as required by the professional notification issued on 02.08.2019, the committee could treat them as unreliable for evaluation. The challenge to the rejection of the technical bids therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>