Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether use of the brand names "NUCOR WELD" and "KEMTRODE" disentitled the appellants to SSI exemption under Notification No. 08/99-CE dated 28.02.1999.
Analysis: The exemption turns on whether the mark used on the goods indicates a connection in the course of trade between the specified goods and some other person. The brands in question had earlier belonged to defunct companies, but the appellants produced the memorandum of understanding and deed of assignment showing authorisation to use the marks, and the trade mark applications were also made in their name. The record did not show any surviving commercial connection between the goods and the earlier companies. The department therefore did not establish that the marks continued to belong to others so as to attract the exclusion from exemption.
Conclusion: The brand names were not treated as belonging to others for the purpose of the notification, and the appellants remained eligible for SSI exemption.
Final Conclusion: The demand, interest and personal penalty could not be sustained, and the appellants succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: A brand name assigned by a defunct prior user does not disqualify SSI exemption unless it continues to indicate a connection in the course of trade with another person.