Tribunal decisions on cost, expenses, and deductions for multiple assessment years.

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for AY 2014-15 and dismissed the Revenue's appeals for AYs 2014-15, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on disallowance of cost of material consumed, vehicle running expenses, repairs & maintenance, excess depreciation, disallowance under section 14A, and fresh claims of deduction under section 80IA in returns filed under section 153A.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of cost of material consumed.
2. Disallowance of vehicle running expenses and repairs & maintenance.
3. Disallowance of excess depreciation.
4. Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.
5. Fresh claims of deduction under section 80IA in returns filed under section 153A.

Summary:

1. Disallowance of Cost of Material Consumed:
The Tribunal examined the disallowance of Rs. 9,58,27,184/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on an estimated basis at 5% of the cost of material consumed. The CIT(A) reduced this to Rs. 2,15,53,154/- (0.64% of gross receipts). The Tribunal noted that the AO did not reject the books of accounts nor provided any evidence to show the expenses were not genuine. The Tribunal held that without rejecting the books of accounts, the AO cannot make an estimated disallowance. Therefore, the disallowance made by the AO was deleted.

2. Disallowance of Vehicle Running Expenses and Repairs & Maintenance:
The AO disallowed Rs. 84,89,467/- for vehicle running expenses and Rs. 1,86,95,467/- for repairs & maintenance, alleging they were claimed twice. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, noting that the AO did not identify any specific instances of double claims. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the AO's disallowance was based on suspicion without concrete evidence.

3. Disallowance of Excess Depreciation:
The AO disallowed Rs. 3,23,72,494/- by applying a 15% depreciation rate instead of 30%. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's claim, relying on the Tribunal's earlier decisions in the assessee's favor. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the issue was already adjudicated in the assessee's favor in previous years, and there was no change in facts or law to warrant a different view.

4. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:
The AO disallowed Rs. 3,05,471/- under section 14A read with Rule 8D, while the assessee had already disallowed Rs. 11,600/- being the exempt income earned. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to the exempt income earned, following judicial precedents that disallowance under section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.

5. Fresh Claims of Deduction under Section 80IA in Returns Filed under Section 153A:
The AO disallowed the fresh claims of deduction under section 80IA made in returns filed under section 153A, arguing they were not claimed in the original returns filed under section 139(1). The CIT(A) allowed the claims, noting that returns filed under section 153A substitute the original returns and should be treated as filed under section 139(1). The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the assessee was entitled to make fresh claims in returns filed under section 153A, and the audit reports in Form 10CCB filed within the time permitted under section 153A should be treated as filed within the time specified under section 139(1).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for AY 2014-15 and dismissed the Revenue's appeals for AYs 2014-15, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on all issues.

---