Delay and laches defeat GST writ challenge where no error was shown in e-bill interception and penalty proceedings.

A writ petition under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was found barred by delay and laches where it was filed more than two years after the impugned appellate order, and the explanation that the order was not received was rejected because the record showed service on the concerned authorities and the petitioner had a duty to follow up the appeal. On merits, no interference was warranted because the appellate authority found no material showing that the e-bill contained the vehicle number, and no error of law or fact was demonstrated in the interception, tax, and penalty proceedings. The impugned appellate and adjudicatory orders were left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the appellate order under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was liable to be dismissed for delay and laches, and whether any error on merits was shown in the impugned orders.

Analysis: The petition was filed after more than two years. The explanation that the petitioner did not receive a copy of the impugned order was rejected because the record showed that copies had been sent to the concerned authorities and the petitioner, and the petitioner had a duty to ascertain the result of the appeal filed by him. On merits, the appellate authority had found no material to show that the e-bill contained the vehicle number and no error of law or fact was demonstrated in the proceedings arising from interception of the vehicle and imposition of tax and penalty.

Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable on account of delay and laches, and no ground was made out for interference on merits. The challenge was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate and adjudicatory orders were allowed to stand, and the writ jurisdiction was not exercised in favour of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: A writ petition may be declined where it is instituted after an unexplained delay and the record discloses no substantive error in the underlying fiscal adjudication.

---