Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to consider revised tax return under Advance Pricing Agreement terms

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the modified tax return filed by the assessee in accordance with the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) terms. The AO was instructed to pass the final assessment order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard, addressing concerns of transfer pricing adjustment, violation of natural justice principles, non-compliance with DRP directions, and violation of APA terms.

---

---

Issues:
- Transfer pricing adjustment under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Violation of principles of natural justice
- Non-compliance with directions issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)
- Consideration of modified tax return under section 92CD of the Act
- Violation of terms of Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)

Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The appeal was filed against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax regarding a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs 17,80,71,602. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined this adjustment during proceedings related to international transactions. The assessee, engaged in software business, filed objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) against the draft assessment order. The DRP issued directions, but the final assessment order retained the same adjustment amount. However, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to consider the modified return filed by the assessee, which reflected the terms of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) entered into with the CBDT.

Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:
The appeal contended that the order was prejudicial and bad in law due to a violation of principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found that the AO's decision to retain the transfer pricing adjustment without considering the modified return filed by the assessee was not factually correct. The AO was directed to pass the final assessment order after considering the modified return and giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Non-Compliance with DRP Directions:
The appeal raised concerns about the AO not following the directions issued by the DRP, which stated that the AO should not make any transfer pricing adjustment except in accordance with the APA entered into by the appellant with the CBDT. The Tribunal's decision to direct the AO to consider the modified return in line with the APA effectively addressed this issue.

Consideration of Modified Tax Return:
The assessee had filed a modified tax return under section 92CD of the Act, offering additional income and paying the consequent tax and interest. The AO, however, did not consider this modified return initially. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the evidence of the modified return filing and tax payment, directed the AO to consider the modified return and pass the final assessment order accordingly.

Violation of Terms of APA:
The order was challenged for violating the terms of the APA, which was considered a binding agreement under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal's decision to uphold the appeal and direct the AO to consider the modified return in line with the APA addressed this issue, ensuring compliance with the terms of the agreement.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of considering the modified return filed by the assessee in accordance with the terms of the APA, and directing the AO to pass the final assessment order after due consideration and providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

---