Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reimbursements received from the Indian group company towards salaries and related costs of seconded employees were taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA.
Analysis: The secondment arrangements showed that the secondees worked under the direction and control of the Indian entity, while the foreign entity merely facilitated salary disbursement on an administrative basis and recovered the actual cost. The salary payments had already suffered tax deduction at source in India, and the reimbursements were on a cost-to-cost basis without any mark-up or independent service element. On these facts, the payment was not consideration for rendering technical, managerial or consultancy services, and the make-available requirement under the treaty was also not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reimbursements were not assessable as fees for technical services or fees for included services, and the addition made on that basis was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where seconded employees work under the Indian entity's control and the foreign entity receives only a cost-to-cost reimbursement of salary already subjected to tax in India, the payment is not fee for technical or included services and no withholding obligation arises on that reimbursement.