TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether demand notices withdrawing MODVAT credit could be sustained without prior notice and opportunity of hearing in terms of Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, notwithstanding the pre-amendment regime under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The credit scheme under Rules 57A and 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 operated within the framework of the parent Act. Although pre-amendment Rule 57-I did not expressly provide for a show-cause notice or a limitation period before disallowing wrongly availed credit, the Court held that the rule could not override the safeguard in Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. A manufacturer found ineligible for MODVAT credit remained a person chargeable with duty, and any recovery action had to comply with the statutory requirement of notice and the principles of natural justice, including audi alteram partem and the giving of reasons in a speaking order.
Conclusion: The demand orders were quashed for want of prior notice and hearing, and the respondents were left free to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing show-cause notices.
Ratio Decidendi: Recovery of wrongly availed MODVAT credit, even under the unamended Rule 57-I, must conform to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the rules of natural justice, so that no demand is enforced without a prior show-cause notice and an effective opportunity of hearing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
