Non-speaking arbitral awards are not set aside merely for absence of reasons under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

In private arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 1940, a non-speaking award is not invalid merely because the arbitrator or umpire has not given reasons. Judicial interference is confined to the limited statutory grounds for remittal or setting aside, and absence of reasons alone does not attract those grounds. Reasons are required only where the arbitration agreement, deed of submission, or a court order expressly so provides, or where some other statutory basis for challenge exists. Where reasons are actually given, the award may still be examined for an error of law apparent on the face of the record.

---

---

Issues: Whether an award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 can be remitted or set aside merely because the arbitrator or umpire has not given reasons for the award.

Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Arbitration Act, 1940 does not expressly require reasons to be given for every award. The limited grounds for judicial interference under sections 16 and 30 show that an award is not open to challenge merely because it is unreasoned. The Court reviewed the history of arbitration law and held that the established Indian position had long been that a non-speaking award is not invalid unless the arbitration agreement, deed of submission, or a court order requires reasons, or unless some other statutory ground for interference is made out. It also distinguished cases where reasons are in fact given, in which event the award may be examined for an error of law apparent on the face of the record.

Conclusion: An award cannot be remitted or set aside solely on the ground that it contains no reasons, unless there is a contractual, judicial, or statutory requirement to give reasons.

Final Conclusion: The law of arbitration was left unchanged, and non-speaking awards remain protected from challenge on the sole ground of absence of reasons, subject to the limited statutory exceptions recognised by the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: In private arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 1940, the absence of reasons in an award is not by itself a ground for remittal or setting aside; judicial interference is confined to the statutory grounds or to cases where reasons were expressly required.

---