Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (2) TMI 462 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal Allows Appeals for Section 80P Deduction Despite Late Filing The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, holding that the assessees were entitled to the deduction under Section 80P despite the late filing of returns ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Tribunal Allows Appeals for Section 80P Deduction Despite Late Filing

                          The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, holding that the assessees were entitled to the deduction under Section 80P despite the late filing of returns within the time allowed under Section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized that the denial of exemption under Section 80P merely on the grounds of belated filing of return is not justifiable, aligning with the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Incorrect claim under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Disallowance of deduction under Section 80P due to late filing of return.
                          3. Prima facie adjustment under Section 143(1)(a).
                          4. Non-adjudication of deduction claim on merits.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Incorrect Claim under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act:

                          The assessees contended that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in confirming the action of CPC Bengaluru by holding that the claim made by the Appellant was an "Incorrect claim" as per Section 143(1) of the Act. The original return of income was filed on 30.11.2020, claiming a deduction of Rs.18,20,276/- under Section 80P. However, the CPC Bengaluru proposed an adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) for not granting the deduction on the grounds that the return was not filed within the due date under Section 139(1).

                          2. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80P due to Late Filing of Return:

                          The assessees argued that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in disallowing the claim of deduction under Section 80P, despite the return being filed within the time allowed under Section 139(4). The assessees relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Limited, which stated that denying exemption under Section 80P merely on the grounds of belated filing of return is not justifiable.

                          3. Prima Facie Adjustment under Section 143(1)(a):

                          The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the action of CPC Bengaluru in making adjustments to the returned income by way of an intimation under Section 143(1), denying the benefit of Section 80P. The assessees contended that such adjustments were not permissible as prima facie adjustments under Section 143(1)(a). The Ld. AR argued that the issue of prima facie adjustment could not be taken into account for disallowing the claim under Section 80P, citing various judicial precedents.

                          4. Non-adjudication of Deduction Claim on Merits:

                          The assessees also raised the issue that the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to adjudicate the ground of disallowance of the claim of deduction under Section 80P on merits. The Ld. AR emphasized that the return was filed within the time limit under Section 139(4), and the rejection of the return on this basis was not valid.

                          Tribunal's Findings:

                          The Tribunal noted that the assessees filed their returns of income not as per Section 139(1) due date but prior to the due date under Section 139(4). This fact was undisputed by the Revenue. Citing the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Limited, the Tribunal observed that denying the exemption under Section 80P merely on the ground of belated filing of return is not justifiable. The Tribunal highlighted that if returns are filed and eligible for consideration, exemptions or deductions under Section 80P should be granted if eligible.

                          The Tribunal also distinguished the present case from the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court, which did not consider whether the return was filed beyond the due date of Section 139(4). The Tribunal concluded that the issue contested by the assessees is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, holding that the assessees were entitled to the deduction under Section 80P despite the late filing of returns within the time allowed under Section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized that the denial of exemption under Section 80P merely on the grounds of belated filing of return is not justifiable, aligning with the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court.

                          Order Pronounced:

                          The Tribunal pronounced the order in the open Court on 10th February 2023, allowing all the appeals.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found