Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was maintainable for deletion of an amount of interest income alleged to have been wrongly included in the return and assessment.
Analysis: Rectification under section 154 is confined to mistakes that are apparent, obvious and self-evident from the record. Where the alleged error can be established only by re-examination of facts or by entering into detailed and debatable arguments, it falls outside the limited scope of rectification. The claim that the interest income was wrongly crept into the return required factual reappraisal and was not a patent mistake on the face of the record.
Conclusion: The rectification application was not maintainable and the rejection of relief was upheld against the assessee.