<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 50 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433535</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 154 is confined to mistakes apparent, obvious and self-evident from the record, and cannot be used where the alleged error requires factual reappraisal or resolution of debatable arguments. On that footing, the claim that interest income had wrongly entered the return and assessment was not a patent mistake on the face of the record. The rectification request was therefore not maintainable, and the rejection of relief was upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 50 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433535</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 154 is confined to mistakes apparent, obvious and self-evident from the record, and cannot be used where the alleged error requires factual reappraisal or resolution of debatable arguments. On that footing, the claim that interest income had wrongly entered the return and assessment was not a patent mistake on the face of the record. The rectification request was therefore not maintainable, and the rejection of relief was upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>