Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings arising from the FIR could be quashed in exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in the face of serious allegations, admissions in the investigation, and disputed questions of fact.
Analysis: The allegations concerned alleged manipulation of RFID e-seals used for export cargo, including switching off tamper alerts and permitting allegedly faulty seals to pass customs checks. The material recorded during investigation, including the petitioner's statements, indicated that the tamper alert system was intentionally switched off by the company and that the decision was known at board level. The controversy thus involved serious factual disputes and admissions that could not be resolved in a proceeding for quashing. The Court applied the settled principle that inherent powers are to be exercised sparingly and that appreciation of evidence is impermissible at the quashing stage, especially where the allegations disclose triable issues affecting public revenue and national security.
Conclusion: The criminal proceedings were not liable to be quashed, and the petition was rejected against the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be used to quash criminal proceedings where the allegations disclose serious triable issues and disputed questions of fact requiring investigation or trial, particularly when the material collected during investigation indicates prima facie involvement.