Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal deserved remand where the dismissal by the lower appellate authority was on the ground of non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement and the assessee disputed service of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The appeal raised a controversy regarding service of the show cause notice on the assessee. Since the Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal for want of compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, the controversy relating to service of notice and the merits of adjudication had not been examined. In such circumstances, the proper course was to send the matter back for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing and recording the fact of service of notice, which is a condition precedent to passing the adjudication order.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded for passing a reasoned order after hearing the assessee, and the assessee succeeded.