<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</link>
    <description>Service of the show cause notice was treated as a condition precedent to a valid adjudication, and because the Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal only for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, the merits and the notice-service dispute were not examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a hearing and recording whether notice had been duly served. The assessee succeeded on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</link>
      <description>Service of the show cause notice was treated as a condition precedent to a valid adjudication, and because the Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal only for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, the merits and the notice-service dispute were not examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a hearing and recording whether notice had been duly served. The assessee succeeded on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>