<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by way of remand, directing the matter to be sent back to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a reasoned order. The appellant was instructed to appear with a copy of the order for further proceedings. The decision emphasized the significance of proper notice and adherence to procedural requirements in tax cases for a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by way of remand, directing the matter to be sent back to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a reasoned order. The appellant was instructed to appear with a copy of the order for further proceedings. The decision emphasized the significance of proper notice and adherence to procedural requirements in tax cases for a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>