Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 826 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellant wins deduction case under Income-tax Act, 1961 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer was ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appellant wins deduction case under Income-tax Act, 1961

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction of Rs. 6,96,725/- claimed by the assessee. Both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and the order was pronounced on 17.01.2023.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for interest received from deposits in co-operative banks.
                          2. Non-adherence to jurisdictional Tribunal judgments by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC).
                          3. Legality of adjustments made by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) under section 143(1) of the Act.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d):
                          The primary issue revolves around the disallowance of a deduction amounting to Rs. 6,96,725/- under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant, a co-operative society, invested surplus funds in various co-operative banks and claimed a deduction on the interest earned from these investments. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this deduction, which was subsequently upheld by the CIT(A) based on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Totgar's Co-Operative Sales Society Ltd.

                          2. Non-Adherence to Jurisdictional Tribunal Judgments:
                          The appellant argued that the NFAC erred in not following the judgments of the jurisdictional Tribunal, which had previously ruled in favor of allowing such deductions. The Tribunal cited several cases, including Palm Court M Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., M/s Solitaire CHS Ltd., and others, where it was held that interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments in co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

                          3. Legality of Adjustments by CPC under Section 143(1):
                          The appellant contended that the disallowance made by the CPC under section 143(1) was a debatable issue and thus, the adjustment was bad in law. The Tribunal noted that the issue of allowability of the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) is no longer res integra and has been settled in favor of the assessee by various coordinate benches of the Tribunal.

                          Tribunal's Findings:
                          The Tribunal examined the facts and legal arguments presented by both parties. It was undisputed that the assessee had invested surplus funds in co-operative banks and earned interest income. The Tribunal referenced the decisions of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court and the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, which held that interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments in co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

                          The Tribunal also reviewed the statutory provisions and previous judicial pronouncements, concluding that the interest income derived from investments with co-operative banks qualifies for the deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal emphasized that a co-operative bank continues to be a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, and thus, the interest income earned from such investments is deductible.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of Rs. 6,96,725/- claimed by the assessee. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 17.01.2023.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found