Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 610 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeal, deletes disallowances for fictitious loss & interest expenses. Genuine transactions upheld. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of both the disallowance of the alleged fictitious loss and the disallowance of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal allows appeal, deletes disallowances for fictitious loss & interest expenses. Genuine transactions upheld.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of both the disallowance of the alleged fictitious loss and the disallowance of interest expenses. The transactions involving the alleged loss were found to be genuine and duly recorded, with the Tribunal noting the lack of evidentiary value in certain statements. Regarding the interest disallowance, the Tribunal concluded that it was not justified as the assessee's interest-free funds exceeded the amount of loans given. The order was pronounced on 11/01/2023 at Ahmedabad.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of Alleged Fictitious Loss - Rs. 6,98,85,971/-
                          2. Disallowance of Interest - Rs. 13,20,000/-

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Alleged Fictitious Loss - Rs. 6,98,85,971/-

                          The assessee, a private limited company engaged in trading Gold, Silver, and Diamond jewelry, reported a loss of Rs. 6,98,85,971/- due to transactions involving the purchase of silver from M/s Pargati Traders and its sale to M/s Harshad Jewellers. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] treated this loss as fictitious, alleging that the transactions were circular and intended to evade tax.

                          The AO's findings were based on:
                          - A document (page 4 of Annexure-B) showing purchases and sales of silver on the same dates at different prices.
                          - A statement from Shri Harshadbhai Jashwntlal Soni, proprietor of M/s Harshad Jewellers, admitting that transactions were managed by the director of the assessee company.
                          - Circular transactions among the bank accounts of the involved parties.

                          The assessee argued that:
                          - The transactions were genuine and recorded in the books of accounts, supported by documentary evidence, and audited.
                          - The statement of Shri Harshadbhai Jashwntlal Soni was unreliable as it was made to shift liability and was not retracted or cross-examined.
                          - The transactions were accepted as genuine in the assessments of M/s Pargati Traders and M/s Harshad Jewellers.

                          The Tribunal found:
                          - The impugned transactions were part of regular business and duly recorded in the books of accounts.
                          - The statement of Shri Harshadbhai Jashwntlal Soni lacked evidentiary value as it was recorded under section 133A of the Act.
                          - The transactions were accepted as genuine in the assessments of the respective parties.
                          - The AO did not conduct an independent inquiry into the nature of the transactions.

                          The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were genuine and the loss incurred by the assessee should be allowed, directing the AO to delete the addition. Thus, the ground of appeal of the assessee was allowed.

                          2. Disallowance of Interest - Rs. 13,20,000/-

                          The AO disallowed Rs. 13,20,000/- of interest expenses, claiming that the assessee diverted interest-bearing funds to interest-free loans to Madhukant Business Group and Shah Trading Co. The assessee argued that:
                          - The advances were given in earlier years.
                          - The parties were facing financial difficulties, making the recovery of the principal amount doubtful.
                          - The assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the advances.

                          The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating that the assessee failed to establish the business purpose of the advances and that the interest-free funds were not available for providing the advances.

                          The Tribunal found:
                          - The assessee's own interest-free funds exceeded the amount of loans and advances given.
                          - A presumption could be drawn that the interest-free advances were given out of the assessee's own interest-free funds.

                          The Tribunal concluded that the disallowance of interest expenses was not justified and directed the AO to delete the disallowance. Thus, the ground of appeal of the assessee was allowed.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, with the Tribunal directing the deletion of both the disallowance of the alleged fictitious loss and the disallowance of interest expenses. The order was pronounced on 11/01/2023 at Ahmedabad.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found