Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer pricing adjustment relating to deemed international transactions of television content production fees required reconsideration in light of additional evidence first produced before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The additional material comprised a confirmation from the associated enterprise and a format agreement with another broadcaster, both of which were relevant to determining the arm's length price of the deemed international transactions. As these documents were produced for the first time and were material to the controversy, they were admitted under Rule 29 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. Since the new evidence was crucial for deciding the dispute properly, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded for fresh consideration and the assessee obtained relief to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only on the transfer pricing ground, which was sent back for reconsideration, while the remaining grounds did not survive for adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: Material additional evidence that is first produced at the appellate stage and is essential to determine arm's length price may be admitted and can justify remand for fresh decision after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.