Condonation of delay and unregistered lease limits: appeal delay was condoned, but lease-based possession relief was rejected.

A delay of 12 days in filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as falling within the statutory condonable outer limit under Section 61(2), and was condoned on a liberal assessment of the explanation offered. The application seeking vacant possession and lease dues was held not maintainable because the lease deed and supplementary agreement were unregistered and the lease had already expired; an unregistered lease for a term exceeding 12 months could not be relied on to enforce the lease terms beyond its legal effect, though directions for rent during the CIRP period were sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the delay of 12 days in filing the appeal against the insolvency order deserved condonation under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (ii) Whether the application seeking delivery of vacant possession and payment of lease dues was maintainable in view of the unregistered lease documents and expiry of the lease.

Issue (i): Whether the delay of 12 days in filing the appeal against the insolvency order deserved condonation under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The appeal had been filed with a delay of 12 days beyond the initial 30-day period, but still within the further condonable period of 15 days permitted by Section 61(2). The explanation offered was linked to the appellant's old age and difficulty in obtaining signatures, and the delay was treated with a liberal and pragmatic approach.

Conclusion: The delay was condoned and the application for condonation was allowed.

Issue (ii): Whether the application seeking delivery of vacant possession and payment of lease dues was maintainable in view of the unregistered lease documents and expiry of the lease.

Analysis: The lease deed and supplementary lease agreement were unregistered and the lease period had expired in January 2022. A lease for more than 12 months requires registration, and an unregistered lease deed cannot be relied upon even for collateral purposes. On that basis, the application was found not maintainable, though directions for payment of rent during the CIRP period were sustained.

Conclusion: The challenge to the impugned order failed, and the reliefs sought by the appellant were rejected.

Final Conclusion: The order under challenge was upheld in substance, and the appeal did not merit interference.

Ratio Decidendi: An appeal filed within the statutory outer limit under Section 61(2) may be condoned on sufficient cause being shown, and an unregistered lease deed for a term exceeding twelve months cannot be treated as the basis for enforcing the lease terms beyond its permissible legal effect.

---