Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Miscellaneous Application seeking recall of the earlier order could be allowed on the ground that non-following of a coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case constituted a mistake apparent from the record under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that, in similar facts, a co-ordinate bench in the assessee's own case had estimated the profit element at 6%, whereas the earlier order had sustained estimation at 12.5%. The failure to follow the earlier coordinate bench decision was treated as a mistake apparent from the record, making the order amenable to rectification under section 254(2).
Conclusion: The Miscellaneous Application was allowed and the earlier order was recalled.