Tribunal allows Covid-related delay, disallows interest deduction, upholds share valuation method

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing cross objections due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) was disallowed as it was not incurred for earning interest income from fixed deposits. The interest income from fixed deposits was held taxable under "Income from other sources." The deletion of the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was upheld, supporting the use of the Discounted Cash Flow method for share valuation.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Delay in filing cross objections by the assessee.
2. Deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) against interest income from fixed deposits.
3. Treatment of interest income as capital receipt.
4. Deletion of addition under section 56(2)(viib) regarding the fair market value of shares.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Delay in Filing Cross Objections by the Assessee:
The assessee filed cross objections with a delay of 322 days, attributing the delay to the Covid-19 pandemic. The Tribunal condoned the delay based on the Supreme Court's judgments in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re 438 ITR 296 (SC) and related cases, thus admitting the cross objections for disposal on merits.

2. Deduction of Interest Expenditure Under Section 57(iii) Against Interest Income from Fixed Deposits:
The Revenue contested the deduction of Rs.6,82,57,053/- claimed by the assessee under section 57(iii) against interest income from fixed deposits. The Tribunal noted that the funds were borrowed for the development of the Sion Panvel State Highway, and the interest paid on these borrowings was not incurred for earning the interest income from fixed deposits. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT Vs. United Wire Ropes Ltd. (1980) 121 ITR 762 (Bom.), which held that interest paid on loans could not be set off against interest earned on deposits if the transactions were not integrated. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction.

3. Treatment of Interest Income as Capital Receipt:
The assessee argued that the interest income earned on FDRs should be treated as a capital receipt, reducing the cost of the qualifying assets. The Tribunal rejected this argument, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT (1997) 227 ITR 172 (SC), which held that interest income earned on short-term deposits is chargeable under section 56 as "Income from other sources." The Tribunal distinguished this case from CIT Vs. Bokaro Steel Ltd. (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC), where interest income was directly connected with the construction activity. The Tribunal concluded that the interest income from FDRs was not connected to the highway development activity and thus should be taxed under "Income from other sources."

4. Deletion of Addition Under Section 56(2)(viib) Regarding the Fair Market Value of Shares:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs.3,74,11,321/- made under section 56(2)(viib) by the AO, who computed the FMV of shares at Rs.1938.29 per share, whereas the assessee issued shares at a premium of Rs.1,990/-. The assessee valued the shares using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method, resulting in an FMV of Rs.2,412/- per share. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO did not find any flaws in the DCF valuation method used by the assessee. The Tribunal referred to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in Vodafone M-Pesa Limited Vs. PCIT (2018) 256 Taxman 240 (Bom.), which supported the use of the DCF method for share valuation.

Conclusion:
- The delay in filing cross objections was condoned.
- The deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) was disallowed.
- The interest income from FDRs was held to be taxable under "Income from other sources" and not as a capital receipt.
- The deletion of the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was upheld, affirming the use of the DCF method for determining the FMV of shares.

---