TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Invalidity of Trade Notice 197/88 affirmed by High Court; Trade Notice 156/90 supersedes.</h1> <h3>BNK. ENGINE PARTS PVT. LTD. Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF C. EX.</h3> The High Court of Madras held that Trade Notice 197/88 was invalid and superseded by Trade Notice 156/90. The court ruled that the earlier notices were ... Job worker The High Court of Madras considered the validity of Trade Notice 197/88, which was later superseded by Trade Notice 156/90. The court ruled that the earlier notices cannot be enforced, allowing for the issuance of fresh notices based on the new Trade Notice. No costs were awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
