Refund claims under Notification No. 12/2013-ST: HC admitted appeal on limitation, consolidated claims, delay condonation, and remand issues.

The Gujarat HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning refund claims under Notification No. 12/2013-ST, including whether the one-year time limit runs from the ISD invoice, whether consolidated quarterly refund claims could cover earlier invoices, whether any discretion existed to permit a delayed claim, whether the Tribunal could condone delay, and whether remand for verification of credit distribution to the SEZ unit was proper. The Court treated the remaining proposed questions as covered by the questions already framed, indicating that the appeal would proceed on those substantial legal issues.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was required to be admitted on substantial questions concerning the applicability of the time limit for filing refund claims under Notification No. 12/2013-ST, the correctness of sanction of refund claimed within one year from the ISD invoice, the permissibility of consolidated quarterly claims covering earlier invoices, the alleged exercise of discretion to permit a delayed claim, the Tribunal's jurisdiction to condone delay, and the propriety of remand for verification of credit distribution to the SEZ unit.

Outcome: The appeal was admitted on the substantial questions of law framed by the Court, while the remaining proposed questions were treated as covered by those questions.

---