Construction company must refund Rs. 26 lakh to flat buyers for retaining ITC benefits under Section 171 CGST Act

NAPA ruled against a construction company for not passing ITC benefits to flat buyers under Section 171 of CGST Act. The developer profiteered Rs. 26,33,536 by retaining 5.92% ITC benefit during July 2017 to November 2020 for a project in Indore. NAPA ordered the company to reduce flat prices commensurate with ITC benefits received, refund the profiteered amount with 18% interest from the date of profiteering until payment, and face penalty proceedings for the period from January 2020 onwards under Section 171(3A) of CGST Act.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allegation of wrong GST rate charged.
2. Failure to pass on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) post-GST implementation.
3. Calculation and determination of the profiteered amount.
4. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
5. Imposition of penalty and interest on the profiteered amount.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Allegation of Wrong GST Rate Charged:
The Applicant alleged that the Respondent charged GST at 12% instead of 1% on the purchase of an EWS house. The investigation revealed that the applicable GST rate for EWS houses was 8% under the Affordable Housing Scheme, not 12%. The Respondent's incorrect charging of GST does not fall under the scope of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The matter was referred to the jurisdictional GST authorities for necessary action.

2. Failure to Pass on the Benefit of ITC Post-GST Implementation:
The DGAP's investigation found that the Respondent had availed ITC of GST to the tune of Rs. 53,74,91,787/- and utilized Rs. 29,26,06,703/- for payment of GST. The Respondent's contention that no ITC was availed was incorrect. The investigation confirmed that the Respondent had benefited from additional ITC post-GST implementation, which should have been passed on to the customers by reducing the prices commensurately.

3. Calculation and Determination of the Profiteered Amount:
The DGAP calculated the profiteered amount as Rs. 26,33,536/- for the project at Kamayani Nagar, Rau, Indore. This amount was based on the additional ITC benefit of 5.92% of the turnover that the Respondent received post-GST. The calculation included the base profiteered amount and the excess collection from customers.

4. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:
Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act mandates that any reduction in the rate of tax or benefit of ITC must be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. The Respondent's failure to pass on the ITC benefit to the customers was a violation of this provision. The Respondent's argument that the project started post-GST and hence the provisions were not applicable was rejected. The investigation showed that the base price of the units was fixed in the pre-GST regime, and the benefit of ITC should have been passed on in the GST regime.

5. Imposition of Penalty and Interest on the Profiteered Amount:
The Respondent was ordered to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 26,33,536/- along with interest at 18% from the date of profiteering till the date of payment. The Respondent was also liable for a penalty under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017, for the period from 01.01.2020 onwards. The jurisdictional CGST/SGST Commissioner was directed to ensure compliance and publish an advertisement to inform the affected home buyers.

Conclusion:
The National Anti-Profiteering Authority concluded that the Respondent had profiteered by Rs. 26,33,536/- by not passing on the benefit of additional ITC post-GST implementation. The Respondent was directed to refund the profiteered amount along with interest and comply with the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. The matter of incorrect GST rate was referred to the jurisdictional authorities for further action.

---