CENVAT credit allowed on imported Manganese ore despite inter-unit transfer, Bill of Entry valid under Rule 9(1)(c)

HC upheld the assessee's entitlement to CENVAT credit on imported Manganese ore, holding that the Bill of Entry is a valid duty-paying document under Rule 9(1)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The court ruled that mere transfer of part of the imported, duty-paid goods to another unit of the same assessee through a transfer memo cannot justify denial of credit, since the basic document evidencing duty payment was produced. Distinguishing precedent cited by revenue, HC found no infirmity in the Tribunal's order and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether Cenvat Credit availed based on "Transfer Memos" beyond Rule 9 is validRs.
2. Applicability of precedent in Union of India vs. Marmagoa Steel Limited.
3. Validity of the Tribunal's order.

Analysis:
1. The main issue in this case is whether the Tribunal correctly allowed the assessee to avail CENVAT credit based on a bill of entry for imported goods, despite the use of "Transfer Memos" not listed in Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The revenue argued that the credit was illegal as per Rule 9, citing the case of Principal Commissioner of Customs vs. BSNL Limited. However, the respondent contended that the bill of entry, an approved document under Rule 9, supported the credit claim, and the goods were used in manufacturing as evidenced by duty payment and import proof.

2. The second issue involved determining the relevance of the decision in Union of India vs. Marmagoa Steel Limited to the current case. The respondent argued that the Supreme Court's decision in Marmagoa Steel Limited, which the Tribunal relied on, supported their position. The Court noted that the Marmagoa Steel Limited case was distinguishable from the present case, as it involved the absence of documents, leading to a remand, whereas in this case, the bill of entry was produced and duty payment was not disputed.

3. The final issue was the validity of the Tribunal's order, which the revenue challenged as perverse and bad in law. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court found that the import of Manganese ore and its utilization in manufacturing were not disputed by the department. The Court held that the bill of entry, being an approved document under Rule 9, entitled the assessee to avail credit based on duty payment for imports. The Court distinguished the case of BSNL Limited and upheld the Tribunal's decision based on the precedent of Marmagoa Steel Limited, dismissing the revenue's appeal and answering the substantial questions against the revenue.

---