Endorsed Bill of Entry accepted for Cenvat credit when duty-paid inputs were received and used in manufacture.

A Bill of Entry remains a valid document for Cenvat credit where the imported inputs are duty-paid, actually received, and used in manufacture, even if the document was originally not in the recipient's name but was endorsed by the importer. Endorsement does not, by itself, negate the evidentiary value of the Bill of Entry under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, credit was allowed and the demand and penalty were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied merely because the Bill of Entry was not originally in the appellant's name but had been endorsed in its favour by the importer.

Analysis: Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 recognises a Bill of Entry as a valid document for availing credit. The materials covered by the Bills of Entry had admittedly been received and used in manufacture, and the duty-paid character of the inputs was not in dispute. The reasoning in Marmagoa Steel and the departmental circular recognising endorsement of Bills of Entry were treated as supporting the view that endorsement does not destroy the evidentiary value of the document. The later amendment regarding importer-issued invoices did not exclude Bills of Entry from the class of valid documents, and the endorsed Bills of Entry were held to be a permissible basis for credit in the factual matrix.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to take Cenvat credit on the strength of the endorsed Bills of Entry.

Final Conclusion: The demand and penalty could not be sustained, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the duty-paid character of imported inputs and their receipt and use are undisputed, a Bill of Entry remains a valid credit document under the Cenvat credit scheme notwithstanding endorsement by the importer in favour of the recipient.

---