Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, pending consideration of the writ petition challenging detention and the demand raised under Section 129(3)(a) of the GST law, the petitioner was entitled to interim release of the goods and on what terms.
Analysis: The goods were alleged to have been transported without an e-way bill, and the authorities had proceeded to assess the amount payable for release of the goods. The petition was not finally decided at this stage, and counter affidavit and rejoinder were directed to be filed. Pending further hearing, the Court considered it appropriate to grant interim protection by allowing release of the goods on partial payment and security for the balance.
Conclusion: Interim release of the detained goods was permitted on payment of half of the demanded amount and furnishing of an indemnity bond for the remaining half.