Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (9) TMI 80 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal overturns CIT(A)'s decision, denies deduction under section 80IB(10) The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision and restoring the AO's order. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal overturns CIT(A)'s decision, denies deduction under section 80IB(10)

                          The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision and restoring the AO's order. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed, affirming the ineligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10) and the applicability of section 115JC.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Date of completion of the housing project.
                          3. Date of approval of the housing project by the local authority.
                          4. Levy of tax under section 115JC of the Income-tax Act.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80IB(10):
                          The primary issue raised by the Revenue was whether the assessee was eligible for a deduction of Rs.45,89,97,747/- under section 80IB(10) despite allegedly failing to complete the project within the stipulated time. The assessee, a Builder and Developer, had claimed this deduction for the housing project "Teerth Towers." The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the claim, arguing the project was not completed within five years from the end of the financial year in which it was approved. The CIT(A) overturned this decision, but the Revenue appealed.

                          2. Date of Completion of the Housing Project:
                          The Tribunal examined whether the project was completed within the required five-year period. According to section 80IB(10), the construction must be completed within five years from the end of the financial year in which the project was approved. The completion date is defined as the date on which the completion certificate is issued by the local authority. The AO found the project was completed on 30-03-2013, more than six years after the approval date. The assessee argued that the project was actually completed on 07-03-2012, based on a letter to the District Collector. However, the Tribunal found discrepancies in the letter dated 07-03-2012 and concluded the project was not fully completed by 24-09-2012. Thus, the Tribunal determined the project was completed after 24-09-2012 but before 30-03-2013, failing to meet the five-year requirement.

                          3. Date of Approval of the Housing Project by the Local Authority:
                          The Tribunal addressed the timeline for the project's approval. The AO argued the approval date was 30-03-2007, while the assessee contended it should be 22-08-2007, when the demarcation certificate was issued. Section 80IB(10) requires the construction to be completed within five years from the end of the financial year in which the project is approved. The Tribunal held that the approval date was 30-03-2007, as the demarcation certificate was a procedural requirement and not the approval itself. Thus, the five-year period ended on 31-03-2012, and the project completion beyond this date disqualified the assessee from the deduction.

                          4. Levy of Tax under Section 115JC:
                          The assessee challenged the levy of tax under section 115JC, arguing it should not apply because the housing project commenced in an earlier year. Section 115JC mandates that if the regular income tax payable is less than the alternate minimum tax, the adjusted total income is deemed the total income for that year. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee's argument, stating section 115JC applies to the previous year as a whole and does not exclude housing projects approved before its enactment. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's challenge to the levy of tax under section 115JC.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision and restoring the AO's order. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed, affirming the ineligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10) and the applicability of section 115JC.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found